Archive for the ‘Technology’ Category

6 ways in which technology could imrove soccer

Posted by Daniel Rey
26 March 2010

Translation in progress.

Mini-guide to buy a computer, part 2

Posted by Daniel Rey
23 March 2010

Translation in progress.

Mini-guide to buy a computer

Posted by Daniel Rey
17 March 2010

Translation in progress, come back soon.

Basics about robotics

Posted by Daniel Rey
11 March 2010

Translation in progress, come back soon!

How the future houses will be?

Posted by Daniel Rey
2 February 2010

In this topic I’m not an expert, far from it, but I have drawn attention to some recent inventions (and not so recent) that perhaps in a future will completely transform the interior and exterior of our homes. If you know any more inventions, I’d appreciate if you comment it here as I would have more info about this topic and our readers can be informed better.

A century ago, inventions such as fridge, microwave, hob and television, were unthinkable. Today, not only are essential in any home, but moreover we don’t pay attention to the advancement that inventions represented at that time. Following this trend, and given that technology advances faster and faster, this could be what awaits us in the not too distant future (10 years, maybe a little more in some points, depending on the purchasing power). Some of the inventions already exist but are reserved for the rich people.

  • Energy: The home of the future will be self-sufficient respect to electricity. Not so the flat of the future, unless the photovoltaic panels improve enough to power an entire building, with a few panels on the roof. Yes, photovoltaics, whose only requirement is to cover the roof of the house with some panels, providing unlimited clean energy at no cost.
  • Internet: There’s no doubt that all steps in that direction will go home automation. For this, the infrastructure of the homes will be improved accordingly. There are 2 possibilities: wireless networks (3G, HSDPA, 4G) will improve dramatically and will completely free us from the telephone wires, or the archaic copper wire will be replaced with fiber optics, much faster. Obviously, this already exists, but only in certain districts of some cities. Furthermore, it isn’t being exploited all the potential it offers.
  • RFID: Perhaps you haven’t heard about these letters (Radio Frequency ID), but surely you’ve ever used that technology. It consists on tiny chips (RFID chips) that contain a short sequence of bytes (an identifier), and can be read by a receiver at a distance of centimeters or even a few meters. They are, more or less, bar codes, but almost invisible, and without need for “visual” contact between the receiver and the chip. For example, they’re used in some public transport vouchers, or library books. Although, if this technology becomes more popular and chips costs diminish further, they can enter our homes as smart barcodes. For example, our futuristic fridge (with RFID reader incorporated), will know what food is inside it (if the food have RFID chips), and can warn you when an item is ending, or even buy it online. It may also suggest recipes based on the ingredients you have available.
  • Appliances: Basically, appliances will be the same as now, just with added computer / robotic abilities. There already exist, at quite affordable prices, robotic vacuum cleaners which aspire continually following a random pattern, so cleaning the whole surface of the house, and even auto-recharge (when they are running out the battery, they plug into the battery charger without human intervention). By adding artificial intelligence to appliances, you could, for example, synchronize the clock with the brewer, so when you wake up, you’ll have a cup of freshly brewed coffee waiting for you. That, coupled with the Internet, opens a new world of possibilities. You can check at any time, via a mobile phone, the state of the house, temperature, and for example, turn on the heating 1 hour before arriving home to find the house already warn when you arrive.
  • Smart items: As blinds, lights or faucets. A motion sensor in the room, which turns on the light when someone comes in and turns it off when the room is empty; blinds that upload themselves when the alarm sounds, or faucets that turn on when you put the hand underneath. In short, sensors that allow “the house” to behave according to what people are doing or to environmental conditions.
  • Computer as the center of the house: From the computer, or even from a mobile phone, you will be able to control absolutely al the parameters of the house, and even automate certain tasks such as turn on and off the heating, or lower the blinds at dusk. Today, computers are no longer computers, are all that and more, and gradually they’re becoming even more. The computer will become the absolute center of the house, integrating television, game console, music player, video, phone…
  • New technologies: Recently, there has been presented a technology that will supposedly “kill” the traditional light bulb in 2013. You can call me skeptical, but I don’t think it will achieve in 3 years that low-energy lights are trying more than a decade. This technology involves a kind of wallpaper that emits light, in a similar way as a computer screen emits light (OLED screens in particular). It has the advantage of lower power consumption, and providing a smoother, more natural light, as it’s distributed throughout the room. If you have lost within my explanation, basically in the future, rather than bulbs, there will be light walls, of course with adjustable intensity, and even colors.

I saw nothing more, although I’m sure there are dozens of inventions that should be taken more into account. Most are simple evolutions of what we know so far, which will be phasing in our lives, until a time when we’ll wonder how we could live without it.

The electronics is taking over our homes just as electricity did in the past century. We expect some interesting decades in which some “premonitions” made by the Science-Fiction writers will come true, such as the smart home, the remote machine controlled with the thought, the hologram or humanoid robots capable of learning (apparently). As I always repeat every time I write an article like this, I don’t have a crystal ball, to see the future it’s best to live it.

Remote control of your computer with GlovePIE

Posted by Selkie
31 January 2010

GlovePIE will be a useful program for you if you have one of the following devices:

Neurosky ThinkGear, Wild Divine Lightstones, Emotiv Epoc, Wiimotes (Wii Remotes), Wii Fit Balance Boards, Playstation 3 controllers (SIXAXIS, Dual Shock 3), Spaceball, Novint Falcon, eMagin Z800, Essential Reality P5 Virtual Reality Glove, 5DT Data Glove, Flock of Birds tracker, Polhemus trackers…

PIE does not refer to that great tasting sweet, but the initials for “Programmable Input Emulator“.

This all means that this progam can be used for  programming a device to control your PC. For example, we can write a small script for playing a PC game through a Wiimote connected using bluetooth, or using its pointer as mouse (we need a infrared sensor but, I don’t know why, my pointer works well without anything else).

The program is very easy to use. It contains many scripts by default, but it’s easy to create new ones by yourself. Making a script doesn’t take much time, because it’s based on assignations of the remote device with the keyboard keys.

We will have different options according to the device, of course. I only tried the program with a Wiimote, and it works properly, it even recognize some of its accesories.

GlovePIE
A script in GlovePIE

Here we have a screenshot of the program, showing a Wiimote test script. Scripts syntax is very simple, I think you’ll need no tutorial to learn to program them.

As you can see, it’s only identifying the keyboards values (Key.*) with the device values (in this case, Wiimote.*).

If we write Key.Space = Wiimote.A, pressing Wiimote’s A button will be the same as pressing the Spacebar in the keyboard. But we also can do other things, such as switching on and off the LEDs, make it shake, etc. Yes, it’s very easy and you can learn it simply by looking at other scripts included.

Goodbye, we finally can control the computer lying in bed! :D

Download GlovePIE at its official site

Cloud computing, the future of technology?

Posted by Daniel Rey
22 January 2010

This is a very complex topic and it has much substance, which could fill hundreds of pages of discussion (which in fact has already filled). Again, I won’t tell you about anything new, anything that hasn’t already been discussed on the Internet. I’m going to explain clearly what it is so fashionable concept, which can be a radical change in the way of understanding the computer science.

Brief History lesson

Informatics has a short but intense life, of just 50 years. I’ll sum it up, since it is necessary to understand the change that Cloud Computing would suppose.

Computers didn’t come into our lives in the shape of a shoe box which we are used to. In the ’60s and ’70s, the first computers occupied entire rooms, weighed several tons (to give you an idea, in the early 80’s a 1GB hard drive was the size of a washing machine drum), and air conditioning systems were required to maintain a constant temperature. Needless to say, they were terribly expensive, accessible only to billionaires and big corporations. However, as time passed, became more “affordable” (in relative terms), so them could be acquired (or, in general, leased) by some universities, for research, impossible to perform manually physical simulations, or to teach new computer engineers. Where was the problem? A computer in a basement room accessible only by authorized staff, worth hundreds of thousands of dollars… How will the students use the computer?Dumb terminals” were invented.

These terminals consisted of a monitor (which could only display a console), and a keyboard. By wiring (Wi-fi was still science-fiction), these terminals were connected to the central computer and may operate through commands as if they were in front of it. It is similar to what happens now with our personal computers. The central computer that interprets the commands (in our case would be the computer box), and is attached by wires to a screen and keyboard (and mouse, which was invented much later) that are used to enter commands and see the results of such orders. As you could connect several dumb terminals to a single central computer, the problem was solved. However, if a small fault arised in the central computer (something quite frequent with these machines), the entire university would be without computers, as dumb terminals themselves were useless.

Years later, late ’80s, came the next big revolution in the world of computing: the IBM PC (Personal Computer). Something similar to what we now mean by “desktop computer”, just that obviously much more expensive and less powerful. At that time, any gentry person could have access to a computer, without leaving home.

The 90s were a revolution after another. First, came the first laptops (they had the size of briefcases). This meant you could use a computer anywhere! Also a technology became popular. Maybe you’re familiar with it: “the Internet“. A way to communicate with people all over the world without leaving home, a source of unlimited knowledge… And its full potential hadn’t been realized yet…

In the last decade, we all have access to a laptop. Even we can afford more than one computer. And if for some reason we don’t have a computer at any given time, we can always go to a friend’s house, any library or university. Almost all the First World has Internet access. Wi-Fi technologies became popular, which allow you to use Internet without being connected to any wires. 3G networks, that allow Internet connection from anywhere in the world, are beginning to popularize. Internet is beginning to being used massively, reducing in some cases a computer into screens and keyboards with internet connection (yes, like dumb terminals). And here is born Cloud Computing.

What is Cloud Computing?

Cloud Computing is a new way of understanding computing, Internet-based. The idea is that computers act as “dumb terminals” that are connected to the Internet (the cloud) and then get the information they need. Thus, it makes no difference using the computer in your house, your ultraportable, your friend’s computer or a library’s one. All you need is a connection to “the cloud“.

If you see it too abstract, let’s think this way. Probably you have an e-mail account and profiles on various social networks like Facebook or Twitter. Maybe you see movies or series on the Internet, using YouTube or Megavideo, for example. Perhaps, to entertain yourself, you play some online games like Runescape or Ogame, or Flash minigames. So even though you have never heard of that concept, you are practically already in the cloud. If we add “less known” services as Google Docs, which lets you edit and save documents in Google’s servers (by accessing in a similar way like in Gmail), websites that offer a hard disk on-line… really wouldn’t matter what computer you use to connect to the cloud (Internet). You can watch movies, check email, play games, edit and read documents or talk with your friends without installing any software on your computer, just a web browser. The web browser then becomes our window to the cloud, our “dumb terminal“.

Recently, Google has released a preliminary version of its operating system, Chrome OS. It is designed for cheap ultraportables. To make it work, an Internet connection is required. Obviously, it’s ready to access all services “in the cloud” that Google offers. In this operating system, the hard disk is not used as such, is only used as “cache” to temporarily store the information downloaded from the cloud. If you need to store any file, you can do in the cloud. If you use another computer, it’s like using another screen and keyboard: just enter your name and password, and you will identify in the cloud and will be able to access all the services you used in your PC.

What do you think about Cloud Computing?

I think it’s very interesting, particularly for people that make more intensive use of the Internet. Thus, if you’re surfing the Internet and find an interesting article, you can add to your “Favorites” in the cloud and access it from any other device. You can do anything you would do on your computer without really needing your computer. No more need for a laptop, for example, for finish a schoolwork if you’re going to spend the holidays with your parents. If your parents have a computer you can use it. If you go to… to anywhere, cause we are surrounded by computers with Internet connection. Thus we reach a new dimension of computing: if till now computers were becoming more and more small to carry our personal files from one place to another, now don’t even need a computer, nor a measly USB stick. We have our files in the cloud, and to access them we just need a dumb terminal that connects to it.

However, this raises many privacy and security problems. If a few years ago, to steal our data someone had to steal our computer, it would be enough for now to crack our password (however, if they steal the PC it wouldn’t hurt). There is also the fact that, with Cloud Computing, our data would be in some big companies’ servers, so our privacy can be seriously compromised. Also, if one of these companies are bankrupt or its servers fall, we’ll lose our data, temporarily or permanently.

Mi conclusión es que esta forma de entender Internet y la informática ya ha llegado, de una forma paulatina, y seguirá avanzando de la misma forma. Una vez más, nadie sabe lo que nos depara el futuro, pero esta vez la tendencia está bastante clara: Cada día surgen nuevos servicios web en el que no importa nuestro PC, sólo importa tener una conexión a Internet, y elegir un nombre y una contraseña. Obviamente, nosotros somos los que elegimos si utilizar o no estos servicios, pero no se puede negar que suponen un avance muy importante, aunque algunos opinen que se trata de volver a los terminales tontos de los años 70.

Sí, me ha salido otro artículo largo. Espero no haberos aburrido, y como siempre espero haberos enseñado algo xD. No dudéis en comentar si tenéis algo que añadir o tenéis alguna duda.

My conclusion is that this way of understanding the Internet and computing has already arrived, in a gradual way, and will continue to move in the same way. Again, nobody knows what the future holds, but this time the trend is quite clear: Every day, new web services in which doesn’t matter our PC, it only matters having an Internet connection, and choose a name and password. Obviously, we are the ones who choose whether to use these services or not, but certainly they pose a major breakthrough, although some people say it means to return to the dumb terminals of the 70s.

Yes, it has turned into another loooong article. Hope I haven’t bored you, and as always I hope I have taught you something haha. Don’t hesitate to comment if you have anything to add or have any questions.

Ultraportables, those little unknown

Posted by Daniel Rey
16 January 2010

Perhaps the title isn’t quite right. If in the years 2008 and 2009 you have not heard about these mini-computers, probably you have been living in a bubble (without Internet, there are bubbles of all kinds). If you don’t know about them, I’ll try to explain what they are and my opinion about them.

What is an ultraportable (UMPC)?

An ultraportable is a more portable PC than a laptop (yes, that’s a mouthful). This means that the characteristics that define a laptop, are amplified in these devices. More battery, lighter, less powerful and much smaller. These machines came into our lives in 2007 with Asus eeePC series, but did not reach the mainstream until 2008. In the last 2 years, there has been a boom, so that now there are all UMPCs of all brands, prices, colors and sizes. However, all of them share the same range of features:

  • Hard drive: Some of them have SSD drives (something like memory cards for mobile phones, but with more capacity), others have a magnetic hard disk (the regular ones). SSD drives are faster, consume less electricity and are absolutely silent. In contrast, magnetic hard drives have much better capacity/price relation. Thus the first ultraportable laptops, in an effort to reduce its size and increasing battery life, had 2-8 GB SSD memory (like SD cards, which have the same size as a coin). However, the market has diversified, and now most have a magnetic hard disk with a capacity that rarely exceeds 120 GB. Why did this? Because although they make more noise, more heat and consume slightly more, the fact is that consumers were wary about a computer with less than 10 GB of capacity.
  • RAM: They go one step behind laptops, as in almost all resspects, like laptops are one step behind desktops. They usually have between 512 MB and 1 GB RAM.
  • Processor: Almost all the ultraportables have an Intel Atom CPU. It is characterized by its small size, apart from not needing a fan, and reduced consumption. However, as you might have guessed, it’s rather slow, working at speeds around 1.66 GHz, although this rate can not be compared with a Core2Duo, for example, as it has 2 cores (like 2 processors in 1) and the Atom only has 1.
  • Display: This is where these computers fail. The former had 7-inch screens with a resolution of 800×480 pixels. Yes, it’s pretty low. They have recently grown in size, reaching screens of 10 or 11.6 inches with resolutions that reach 1366×768, which are similar to those of the “traditional” laptops (15 inches). However, although the resolution is very good, you better have a good view, because they have very small screens. Although clear, if you want a big screen, do not buy a pocket-sized laptop haha.
  • Battery: The battery, like all components, must be very small. Although it has less capacity than a laptop battery, all the computer parts are designed to consume little power. Thus, if in the laptop market we found battery life from 2 to 4 hours in the ultraportables we have durations from 4 hours to 11. Yes, I was not mistaken: 11 hours of battery!
  • Accessories: They tend to have almost all the accessories that have a standard laptop. Graphics card (low power) with VGA output, Wi-Fi, keyboard (though it usually has the keys close together and small, and have no numeric keypad), trackpad, several USB ports, webcam, speakers and microphone… Although, most models have no CD/DVD, they occupy too much. But… When was the last time you put a CD in your computer? Game CDs don’t count as ultraportables are not intended to play video-games.
  • Price: This is them strength, they are usually pretty cheap, rarely exceeding 600$. Keep in mind, if you are thinking of buying one for the price, that for 200 more dollars you have a “real” 15-inch laptop, with much more power, hard disk and RAM, and a less cramped keyboard.

What is an ultraportable suitable for?

That’s a good question. To begin, I’ll say what is NOT an ultraportable suitable for:

  • Watching high-definition movies. Obviously, such as small screens are not made for that. Moreover, decode HD content requires many CPU cycles, and therefore much battery.
  • Playing next-generation games. The hardware of these mini-computers isn’t powerful enough to play any game from the last… 3 years. It’s also another way to drain quickly the battery.
  • Replace your desktop or laptop computer. If you had a computer and you want to change it, don’t buy an ultraportable. Its tiny screen is not suitable for daily use, unless you plug it to an external display.

Having discarded some utilities, here’s what IS an ultraportable suitable for:

  • Using it as a portable DVD player. I guess you all know those little DVD players with a tiny screen to watch films in the car, for example. Well, an ultraportable can fulfill the same function, with a better screen, plus it’s a computer. However, keep in mind that many of them don’t have DVD reader, so you must have the movies on your hard drive (I guess that will be no problem there hehe).
  • Great mobility. Ending a job or reading a paper on a long train journey, taking notes in college, checking your e-mail from anywhere with Wi-fi… all in less than 1 Kg weight.
  • As a company to another computer. If you already have a desktop or a larger laptop, you can buy an ultraportable to do everything you would do with the previous ones, but anywhere. Although of course, with less power, less screen, and possibly no internet connection (although now there are even buses with Wi-fi).

Are the smartphones ultra-ultraportables?

Perhaps this is a question that you hadn’t raised. But if you ask me, the answer is YES. These phones with 3G connection (ie Internet anywhere within mobile coverage), 3 to 4 inches touch display, and the ability to add programs, either free or pay. It’s the evolution of PDAs, adding the role of telephone and Internet. The best known example is the iPhone. Well, I will show why these phones are computers smaller than ultraportables.

  • Display: 3 to 4 inches. The resolutions ranging from 320×240 up to 800×480. Enough to surf the web, read mail, read or write a document, etc…
  • Specifications: RAM between 128 and 512 MB. ARM processor between 500 MHz and 1 GHz (while consuming less power than the Atom), the “hard disk” is an SD memory, which can be purchased separately in most cases, reaching up to 8 GB. The battery last up several days, but about 6 hours if you are making intensive use of the phone (call, browse the web, or playing 3D games).
  • Accessories: Here are amazing. Camera, video-camera, 3G connectivity, Wi-Fi, GPS, FM radio and so on. Although of course, it depends on the model.
  • Size: They fit into the palm of a hand, and of course in a pocket. Almost their entire area is covered with a touch screen.

So, as you will see a smart-phone serves the same purposes as an ultraportable:

  • Using it as a portable DVD player: Their screen is fairly small, but as they are often hold up with hands, one can see a series or movie without problems. My personal experience is to see episodes of “Friends” while I’m on the bus (one chapter takes the exact time haha) and it looks great, though of course, “Friends” is not a series with relies heavily on visual effects.
  • Great mobility: Even more than an ultraportable, since you have an Internet connection anywhere (provided there is mobile coverage). With these phones you can check email, read a PDF, etc..

And it’s also a phone.

And what about the future?

I’m not a future teller, so maybe you should ignore me. Here we go:

Ultraportables will stay between 10 and 12 inches, will remain at current prices and will incorporate improvements over time. This is not to be a future teller, it’s all about logic. If they make them bigger, would contribute nothing over a conventional laptop, if price increase of up to 750$, for the same money people would buy a laptop. And obviously, as technology advances, the components of the ultraportables will have to move on accordingly. More or less, I would say that the performance of ultraportables will remain about 3 years behind the laptops (ie a laptop 3 years ago has the same power as a current ultraportable), as well as the performance of laptops are kept 1 year or 2 behind the desktop computers.

Hybrids between ultraportables and smartphones will appear. In fact, Nokia has already done it. They have created (at a high price) a very powerful ultraportable that also incorporates 3G (and thus SIM card). Increasingly larger Smartphones, laptops that flirt with phone functions such as touch screen, the rise of the tablets… A tablet is, for those who don’t know, a computer the size of a sheet (obviously thicker), which has touch screen but no keyboard. It’s like a giant PDA.

The next years seems to be interesting, with the popularization of 3G networks, everyone connected to the Internet anytime anywhere, computers that fit in the pocket, cell phones converted into genuine Swiss Army knives of technology (there are some that even have compass!)… Cheaper OLED displays, which allow a much higher pixel density (imagine a 7-inch screen that has the same resolution than a TV of 40…), also cheaper touch screens and, above all, multi-touch (enabling click on more than one point on the screen at once, that is, with several fingers)… In short, I don’t want to miss this decade. Like before, it may will only consist in an evolution of what already exists, with a few other “revolutionary” invention that all manufacturers will imitate. However, we are witnessing a gradual change in the way we understand computing, called Cloud computing. But that’s another story that should be told … (in another article).

Films and TV in 3-D

Posted by Daniel Rey
12 January 2010

Recently, it covers all the attention. 3-D Avatar, remaster this or that film to be 3-D, 3-D capable televisions at prohibitive prices, and so on. I won’t be less, so I will discuss the different technologies to perforn 3-D effects and give my personal opinion.

Filming in 3-D

It’s one of the greatest challenges is facing the film industry, perhaps comparable to other landmarks such as sound or color. What does it take to record a movie in 3-D? Well, maybe I should first explain what the 3-D is.

We have 2 eyes. (so far, nothing unknown). As our eyes are at a distance from each other, each one receives a slightly different image. You can do a simple test: Place a finger pointing upward, between you and the screen. Shut one eye and then the other. It seems that the finger is in a different position relative to the screen, because really you are looking it from a different angle. The further you put finger, the lower the feeling. The human brain (which is awesome) processes and interprets the 2 images, giving us the feeling of distance. That is 3-D, the third dimension, depth. For example, a typical pirate with an eye patch, probably wasn’t a good swordsman, since he couldn’t know precisely how far was his opponent.

However, there is a little problem: The screen of a cinema or television is flat, our eyes receive the same image, so don’t get a 3-D sense. So, to record a movie in 3-D, 2 movies have to be recorded, with a special camera (called stereoscopic) that has 2 lenses (yes, as our 2 eyes). Needless to say, these cameras are terribly expensive. Then, using different techniques, they must get our left eye see the movie recorded with the left lens, and our right eye, the other one.

Anaglyph

Ana… what? You may ask. Surely if I say “those ratty granny glasses with a red cellophane eye and the other blue”  will be more familiar to you. It is the cheapest and hence the less quality to see in 3-D cinema.The 2 movies are recorded on the same roll, one applying to them a red filter, and the other a cyan (blue) filter. If you try to see one of those movies and take off your glasses, that is what you will see: a double image, with blue and red parts.

The glasses are simple filters, so that one eye only sees the part of the film that was applied the red filter, and the other eye, the blue filter. The sense of depth is not great, but neither bad.

Polarized glasses

I won’t bore you with the theory behind these glasses. This is the most used technique in theaters today, because it gets much better quality than with anaglyphs, and glasses are disposable. The glasses are polarized, one horizontally and one vertically. The one that is vertically polarized, passes only the part of the film that is polarized vertically, and vice versa. However, this technique requires a special projector. Therefore, although you get these glasses and you download a movie in 3-D, you won’t see anything, anything in 3-D, I mean (as opposed to the anaglyph).

The super-glasses

I haven’t had the pleasure of trying them, but it is definitely an option for the future. It requires a TV or movie projector that goes twice as fast (double photograms per second). Then, the images of the 2 films are inserted, thus remaining in the frame pairs the images to see the right eye and the odd frames that ones to see the left. The glasses have an infrared receiver that is synchronized with the projector (to have precision). These glasses also have a LCD crystal in each eye, which totally obscures if it receives an electrical impulse. Thus, when the spectator must “see” a frame with the right eye, the left lens darkens, becoming opaque, and vice versa. The problem: Each pair of glasses costs more than 60$, and the projector also has to be special (ultra-fast). However, this technique gives better picture quality because you’re REALLY seeing 3-D, a different movie for each eye.

TVs with built-in 3-D

There are televisions, launched recently, and therefore reserved for this sector of the population that does not look at the prices, which incorporate 3-D without glasses (besides TVs with the super-glasses technology commented above). Although no-one seems too good, I have called attention to 2 types of technology:

  • The first one is based on the same as the Pokemon “Pogs” that evolve, or in general, those stickers that if inclined more or less, the picture changes. These televisions, with convex crystals, they make the image that reaches each eye is different. What is the problem? For that to happen, you have to be in an exact position in front of the TV. So, no moving, and no inviting some friends to a movie 3-D. Strictly one-man.
  • The second has a much simpler approach. Instead of display a flat image as “traditional” televisions, it displays multiple layers (8, I think, model dependent). For example, the background lanscape is displayed in a layer, the trees in another few millimeters fore, and the person who is in the foreground, fore. Thus, according to the manufacturer, you get a sense of depth of 20 inches. Yes, I too think it’s few, but remain 20 inches MORE than we already have in today’s televisions.

We are seeing numerous 3-D movies in our billboards, some of them animation movies. What is the reason? Apart from the sudden fad that has just emerged, of which James Cameron has a good share of the blame, the fact is that more computer-generated scenes are increasingly being used  (in the case of animated films, the entire film). In 3-D design programs, it’s relatively easy to place a second (virtual) camera few inches from the original to create a second film. It can be done even in the post-production stage, unlike the “traditional” films, which need to have the expensive stereoscopic camera from the beginning of filming. Since add 3-D to an animation film has no overrun, an to add “3-D” at the end of the movie name is an added value, I would ensure that 80% of animated films, from now will be in 3-D. I firmly believe too, that many “classic” animation films will be remastered in 3-D.

As for the domestic market, I see a lot more long term, at least in Spain. The Spanish are sick of buying DTT decoders (or TVs with it integrated), then pay-DTT decoders, to continue broadcasting all the same shit on TV (nor even broadcast a movie in 720p…). Naturally, it would be interesting to see a movie in Blu-ray with a TV that supports 3-D, but for that to be affordable to the general public, still miss it… at least 8 years. This reminds me of Home Cinema systems with 6 or 7 speakers: An invention for the rich people, but now that is affordable, few people have it at home, because man, while watching a newscast is not going to notice.

The truth is that I look forward to lower prices, and in a few years buy a Full-HD TV with 3-D, a PS4 (I guess by then it will be out), a surround sound system, and play GTA 7 feeling the bullets coming towards me… although it will take time until all that cost us less than the room on which it will be.